Have you seen increases in price due to vendors adding AI features? Are there higher fees with AI investments?

433 viewscircle icon5 Comments
Sort by:
VP of Information Technology3 days ago

There is a significant push for AI tools in manufacturing, particularly for digital recognition systems that identify errors on production lines. While we are not developing applications ourselves, we see value in adopting proven solutions, especially in manufacturing.

CIO in Manufacturing3 days ago

We consciously deploy agnostic AI agents where they bring true value, such as in manufacturing. Specialized machines benefit from AI for predictive maintenance. We prefer to wait before making large investments.

Sr. Director, Technology3 days ago

Vendors are experimenting with pricing and licensing strategies. For example, Google initially offered Gemini as a separate SKU, then integrated it into Workspace with an incremental fee. We can expect more varied strategies as the market matures. There is also a risk of vendor lock-in, similar to what we’ve seen in the smartphone space, and a land grab among ERP vendors for AI supremacy. An agnostic approach may be preferable to avoid ecosystem limitations.

1 Reply
no title3 days ago

While I’m not certain agnostic is the right answer, it has worked for me. We are taking a wait-and-see approach, proving value without committing to a single vendor.

Chief Information Officer3 days ago

Many major solutions require separate licensing for AI features, resulting in increased costs.

Content you might like

Strategic Alignment: ensuring AI projects directly support mission outcomes and priorities.32%

Governance & Oversight: establishing clear policies, risk management, and accountability frameworks.36%

Workforce Readiness: building AI literacy, confidence, and trust across roles.32%

Technical Infrastructure: ensuring secure, accessible data and platforms to support AI.

View Results

Planning12%

Design48%

Development20%

Testing8%

Deployment9%

Support1%

View Results